<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SeoBlackhat.co.uk &#187; Cookie Stuffing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/category/cookie-stuffing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk</link>
	<description>The alternative to making money online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Legal ClickJacking Code</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/19/legal-clickjacking-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/19/legal-clickjacking-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Click Per Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloaking Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[div id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal clickjacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YOU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatmoneymaker.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
***REPLACE &#8220;SAMPLE&#8221; LINK WITH  			YOUR AFFILIATE LINK***
***YOU MAY NEED TO ADJUST HEIGHT AND WIDTH OF PIXELS DEPENDING ON  			PLACEMENT***
** PUT THIS BLOCK OF CODE AFTER THE &#60;BODY&#62; TAGS**
&#60;div id=&#8221;open&#8221;
onmouseover=&#8221;document.location=&#8217;http://www.SAMPLELINK.com&#8216;;&#8221;
style=&#8221;position:absolute;width:8px;height:7px;background:#FFFFFF;border:1px&#8221;&#62;&#60;/div&#62;
&#60;script&#62;
function updatebox(evt) {
mouseX=evt.pageX?evt.pageX:evt.clientX;
mouseY=evt.pageY?evt.pageY:evt.clientY;
document.getElementById(&#8216;open&#8217;).style.left=mouseX-2;
document.getElementById(&#8216;open&#8217;).style.top=mouseY-2;
}
&#60;/script&#62;
***PUT THIS BLOCK OF CODE BELOW THIS LINE ON YOUR PAGE WHERE YOU  			WANT TO HAVE YOUR LINK. CHANGE THE DOMAIN TO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Flegal-clickjacking-code%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Flegal-clickjacking-code%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">***REPLACE &#8220;SAMPLE&#8221; LINK WITH  			YOUR AFFILIATE LINK***<br />
***YOU MAY NEED TO ADJUST HEIGHT AND WIDTH OF PIXELS DEPENDING ON  			PLACEMENT***<br />
** PUT THIS BLOCK OF CODE AFTER THE &lt;BODY&gt; TAGS**</span></p>
<p></strong>&lt;div id=&#8221;open&#8221;<br />
onmouseover=&#8221;document.location=&#8217;<strong>http://www.SAMPLELINK.com</strong>&#8216;;&#8221;<br />
style=&#8221;position:absolute;<strong>width:8px;height:7px</strong>;background:#FFFFFF;border:1px&#8221;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;<br />
&lt;script&gt;<br />
function updatebox(evt) {<br />
mouseX=evt.pageX?evt.pageX:evt.clientX;<br />
mouseY=evt.pageY?evt.pageY:evt.clientY;<br />
document.getElementById(&#8216;open&#8217;).style.left=mouseX-2;<br />
document.getElementById(&#8216;open&#8217;).style.top=mouseY-2;<br />
}<br />
&lt;/script&gt;<strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">***PUT THIS BLOCK OF CODE BELOW THIS LINE ON YOUR PAGE WHERE YOU  			WANT TO HAVE YOUR LINK. CHANGE THE DOMAIN TO THE DESIRED NAME YOU  			WANT IT TO SHOW AS. CHANGE &#8220;Click Here&#8221; TO WHATEVER YOU LIKE ***</span></p>
<p></strong>&lt;a href=&#8221;<strong>http://www.SAMPLELINK.com</strong>&#8221; onclick=&#8221;updatebox(event)&#8221;&gt;&lt;font<br />
style=&#8221;font-family:arial;font-size:16px&#8221;&gt;<strong>Click Here</strong>&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/19/legal-clickjacking-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackHat New Identity = unlimited resources -</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/06/blackhat-new-identity-unlimited-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/06/blackhat-new-identity-unlimited-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloaking Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BANK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deed poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatmoneymaker.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
As some people know im big time black hat.. on the net and off..
There are various ways to either take an identity or create your own with alot of ease.. its just knowing how to do it.. and its good to keep your actual name / identity clean
I call it beating the system
Im from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F04%2F06%2Fblackhat-new-identity-unlimited-resources%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F04%2F06%2Fblackhat-new-identity-unlimited-resources%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>As some people know im big time black hat.. on the net and off..</p>
<p>There are various ways to either take an <span>identity</span> or create your own with alot of ease.. its just knowing how to do it.. and its good to keep your actual name / <span>identity</span> clean</p>
<p>I call it beating the system</p>
<p>Im from the UK so I will explain where and what entails and what can be gained from changing your personal info:</p>
<p>Years ago I was in the British army, came out with alot of debt, but worked with intelligence officers.. so I know a thing or two..</p>
<p><strong>method 1#</strong><br />
It is legal without using deed poll, you can just resume any name that you think off, its best putting this in your local newspaper and letting resources such as you tax office know that you have done it.. it is that simple:</p>
<p>this is done in stages,</p>
<p>NAMECHANGE = BILLS = BANK ACCOUNT / PASSPORT /</p>
<p>the problems with this is you need ID&#8217;S and thru this method it can be hard, because you will need a national insurance number: or bills to get bank details to resume more proof</p>
<p><strong>Method#2</strong><br />
Deed poll, change your name, but this will be tied to you address.. so its always best to use a family or close friend address, BUT do a credit report on the address, make sure the address is not black listed, if it is you cannot get credit, or credit cards.. once your name has changed then you can go for bank accounts, but the low down on this, is that you do actually change your name by law.. so I wouldnt use this method.</p>
<p><strong>Method#3</strong><br />
My favorite, Using <span>fake</span> documents.. There is a site out there, (pm me for the site) which charges 300 for a UK driving license.. they do utility bills, bank statements.. ok all at a price but you can setup a virtual <span>identity</span>..</p>
<p>Ive tried this, the photo id of the driving license was on TV approx 6 months ago, they showed an actual official from dvla a <span>fake</span> license and he couldnt tell the difference.. these have the hologram logo on them, the dogs bollocks.. then there is utility bills, rent statements, landlord agreements.. all with the info on that you choose.. all that is real is the picture of your mug shot..</p>
<p>Once you have all this, you could have real credit cards, real bank accounts, under your <span>fake</span> ID. You then can move to the internet setup your paypal , **** and scam or make a fortune..</p>
<p>problems come accross is national insurance, a freidn of mine changed his last 2 digits on his NI, and after several months, contacted NI, saying his boss told him his NI was wrong and why he didnt have a ni number.. they asked for his birth certificate.. he didnt have one.. told a cock and bull story he lived on a farm, in a remote area..and was brought up by his aunt and didnt know his real family.. he got his NI number 6 weeks later and his NI card came a further 2 weeks later</p>
<p>I personally know a few people making new accounts every 6 weeks, spending like hell, , making shops on **** with virtual stock, making a small mint then closing everything they have..</p>
<p>my brother is setting up a mortgage with a <span>fake</span> ID.. he wants to do property management, to sell and move on..or to let properties..</p>
<p>Unlimited resources</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/04/06/blackhat-new-identity-unlimited-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackhat &#8211; SES Wrap-up</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/16/blackhat-ses-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/16/blackhat-ses-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attendees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googleplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray shirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hallways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteLinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
While I  know there are a ton of summaries from the sessions, I went to very few due  to the content was heavily centered around beginners. I spent most of my time  in the hallways and foyers getting key information.
Just a  quick reminder of the story I shared last week at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F16%2Fblackhat-ses-wrap-up%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F16%2Fblackhat-ses-wrap-up%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>While I  know there are a ton of summaries from the sessions, I went to very few due  to the content was heavily centered around beginners. I spent most of my time  in the hallways and foyers getting key information.</p>
<p>Just a  quick reminder of the story I shared last week at SES: At the Google Dance at  the GooglePlex, all the SES attendees were given black t-shirts and all  Google employees were given gray t-shirts. An interesting thing happened when I arrived and was given my black t-shirt. A Google employee stopped me and  asked me if I&#8217;d be willing to trade my black for his gray shirt.</p>
<p>Why  not? Works for me. I just didn&#8217;t realize how well it would work later.</p>
<p>I went  into the restroom and changed shirts and walked around and took pictures. I  needed a break and I went and sat down in this lounge area. Before I knew it, I  was surrounded by about a half dozen &#8220;gray shirts&#8221; (Google employees). One of them motioned to me. &#8220;They stuck you with picture duty, huh?&#8221; Without really thinking, I replied, &#8220;Yeah, you know Lumberg.&#8221; (In reference to the idiot boss in the movie &#8220;Office Space&#8221;). &#8220;You have a &#8216;Lumberg&#8217; for a boss too?!?!?&#8221; said another. And then comments  were made in how stupid their bosses were. I was now a part of the club. I  then casually asked each which department they were in and then asked, &#8220;What are you guys working on?&#8221; Their responses are detailed below &#8230;</p>
<p>I also  got answers to your questions.</p>
<p>In all,  SES was, well boring. No worries. I kept myself plenty busy. Here are some cool  tips that you may not have been aware of:</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #1:</strong> Has Google tagged your site as suspicious? Run a check yourself:</p>
<p>http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://www.webmarketingnow.com/</p>
<p>Just  substitute your URL for mine. It will not only tell you the last time GoogleBot  visited the site, which is more accurate than the cache. This tool states the  page was last visited by GoogleBot on the 27th (two days ago) as opposed to the  Google Cache which shows the 23rd (6 days ago).</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #2:</strong> Make sure you have a Google Webmaster Tools account as within the next  30 days they will show where your links originate (more below) and they may  possibly show the weight and anchor text as well. According to the product  manager, it was &#8220;number crunching hell&#8221; getting it to work, but they got it done.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #3:</strong> <a href="http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/seo-site-audit/">Perform a  Site Audit</a>. This is vital as Google has new technology coming out  which will allow them to better determine links from &#8220;bad places&#8221; and these links will get more hammered than ever before. There is hope the links  will be discounted altogether. Make sure you go through my Site Audit process.</p>
<p>&lt; http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/seo-site-audit/ &gt;</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #4:</strong> Link Networks Beware. The Google &#8220;anti-spam team&#8221; is getting more aggressive when it comes to link networks. While there aren&#8217;t going to  be any new filters, the current ones will be injected with new algos to sniff  out and find link networks and discount the links coming from those areas. While  the only penalty given will be to the site selling the link (which is  currently the process), the site buying the link will not receive the benefit they  thought they were purchasing.</p>
<p>Google  is getting VERY aggressive with link networks, but no matter how aggressive  they get, my links with <a href="http://www.linkworth.com/">Link Worth</a> have always done well and have never been filtered according to my testing.  Just don&#8217;t go nuts with it. A word of caution, they have been showing up at  search engine conferences (they were at Webmaster World last year and they were  at SES last week) so their profile may be on Google&#8217;s radar now.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #5:</strong> If you use the Google Website Optimizer start small with testing three  main changes. Chose three of the following: Headline, Call to Action, Offer,  Price. According to the product manager, by starting small and getting a good  feel for what really works for your page with the &#8220;big stuff&#8221; you can then get granular and test smaller things. She was very adamant about focusing on  a few changes and getting the &#8220;big picture&#8221; first before diving in and testing the small stuff.</p>
<p>I have  been following her advice and so far I am finding I am having more success  with the Google Website Optimizer.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #6:</strong> Google admitted to compressing the PageRank scale which caused many  sites, mine included, to go down in PageRank despite their link profile going up. An engineer I spoke with went through my site and when I mentioned my link  profile went up by my PageRank went down he typed a bit on his laptop and said, &#8220;Hmmm &#8230; you&#8217;re right and you&#8217;ve been busy lately.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know what that comment meant as my link building hasn&#8217;t really changed much  this year with the exception of Web 2.0 properties.</p>
<p>Bottom  Line: PageRank has little real power anymore. Focus on your traffic and  conversion levels instead and build links for your sub pages. Also, don&#8217;t forget to monitor your cache dates.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #7:</strong> Google Local Results have been known for years to be primarily focused  around the &#8220;city center&#8221;. Simply find where the big arrow was pointing in the map and get a business address near there. You also needed a site  with traffic and you would often be in the top three, if not #1 for your main targeted phrase.</p>
<p>It was  that easy.</p>
<p>But  then something happened and it wasn&#8217;t so easy anymore and the listings would  seem to be all over the place. After discussing this issue with a few top SEOs  and also asking the right questions to the Google engineers, I did a little test  in the Bay Area. I woke up early and drove around San Jose, Milpitas, Mountain  View, Sunnyvale, Saratoga, Los Gatos, whew. And they all checked out.</p>
<p>What is  the secret?</p>
<p>The  post office. That&#8217;s right. In major cities there is usually one post office per ZIP  code, and in cities where there are numerous ZIP codes, it is the post office  that is closest to downtown that is key. Now, I also checked businesses who had  post offices boxes and they do <strong>NOT</strong> come up at the top. The  same is true for boxes at the UPS store too. You actually must have a physical  business address.</p>
<p>So if  you are having issues with Google local, just sign up for a free account, get  verified and make sure your address is close to the post office downtown and  you&#8217;re in good shape.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #8:</strong> Check your niche category in DMOZ for 404 domains or &#8220;Site Under  Construction&#8221; and look to buy those domain. Yeah, this tip has been around for awhile,  but it is one you often forget. Just one domain could help turn around a  campaign, as DMOZ still carries a lot of weight.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #9:</strong> Look for competitors who have dropped services and pick up those links.  For example, if you are in the email autoresponder business and your  competitor drops that service, do a backlink check on their autoresponder page,  hire someone with a great phone demeanor and have them start dialing. &#8220;Yes, good afternoon, you are currently sending your customers to a dead  third-party page and we&#8217;d like to be the company your refer your customer to. We&#8217;ll  also give you a referral fee for every customer we get for as long as they  remain our customer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bingo.  Suddenly, not only are you getting a good link, but you are getting a good  affiliate to help boost your business and a new relationship to work on.</p>
<p><strong>Tip  #10:</strong> Mess with People&#8217;s Sites for Fun. As I was talking to another affiliate  he asked me what my main domain was and in just a few minutes he showed me  my site with his name in big letters at the top. Initially, terror set in  thinking he had somehow hacked into my site, when in reality all he did was change  the browser page to be editable. He wouldn&#8217;t show me how he did it so I did  some searches and found the code. Just insert this code into your URL address  bar:</p>
<p>javascript:document.body.contentEditable=&#8217;true&#8217;; document.designMode=&#8217;on&#8217;;  void 0</p>
<p>You can  then edit away. <img src='http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Bonus Tip:</strong> <a href="http://www.google.com/health/">Google Health</a></p>
<p>Okay,  fine, this isn&#8217;t SEO related, but it is very cool and I spent nearly a half hour  with the project manager at the Google Dance going through it. It can integrate  your health records and with your permission share your data with certain  health sites to help you overcome health issues.</p>
<p><strong>Q&amp;A</strong></p>
<p>Q: Tell  me more about Google SiteLinks. How do they determine which links are used?</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> First of all, make sure you review my article about SiteLinks I  published last year. <a href="http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/sitelinks-how-to/">SiteLinks: How  to Get Them</a>.</p>
<p>&lt; http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/sitelinks-how-to/ &gt;</p>
<p>I have  tested SiteLinks algo pretty hard and the one thing I have learned is that the  algo is NOT easily influenced. In other words, attempts to &#8220;steer&#8221; Google to the links you want included doesn&#8217;t work on a consistent basis.</p>
<p>As far  as getting certain keywords to appear as SiteLinks for your domain, it has  mostly to do with your site being &#8220;the&#8221; landing spot for that search. It isn&#8217;t as easy as you might think. For example, I am getting a Mac this  weekend. It is my ritual, a new laptop every Labor Day, and this year, I&#8217;m going  Mac &#8230; let&#8217;s see if it sticks this time. <img src='http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If I do  a search for &#8220;Apple&#8221; &#8230; apple.com has SiteLinks. However, it does NOT have SiteLinks for the following phrases: iPhone, iTunes, iPod, Mac. The only  phrase I could get to come up for Apple.com with SiteLinks was &#8220;macintosh&#8221;, and that was really one of my &#8220;last gasp&#8221; phrases to try.</p>
<p>So, as  you can see, even the large companies have issues when it comes to getting the  right keywords tagged with SiteLinks for their domains.</p>
<p><strong>Q:  Does the geographic location of the web host matter for search? Organic?  Local?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> I had a great discussion about this with three Google engineers. The  actual location of the server does not matter. Even though there is some &#8220;chatter&#8221; that it does matter, the choice where to host is clearly yours as a business owner. However, where people tend to get into  trouble is the TLD (Top Level Domain). For example, if you had a web business in  Portland, Oregon, it wouldn&#8217;t make too much sense to have a co.uk domain would it?  And the same is true the other way around. If you want localized traffic,  and you&#8217;re in the UK, get both the .com and .co.uk domains. Build out the .co.uk  and 301 redirect the .com to your localized domain. This way you keep your  brand, but you are far more likely to get localized traffic with the proper TLD  than without it.</p>
<p>Tip: If  you are in the US, you don&#8217;t need a local host to rank well locally. Your &#8220;dot com&#8221; doesn&#8217;t need to be hosted in Portland if you are also in Portland. You can host in Miami and rank just as well in the local search.</p>
<p>Q: What  changes is Google working on right now?</p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>I was able to get some info when a group of Googlers thought I was an  employee by accident. The biggest issues was a new filter they are working on which  would &#8220;kill half the businesses here tonight.&#8221; The individual who said that was pretty young, and I have learned over the years in this industry  that young people like to talk and say bold things in order to get attention and  have a feeling of &#8220;betterment&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t  believe that statement for many reasons, first, he has no clue about the level  of people at the party &#8230; as SES attracts mainly newbies. And I followed this  comment up with a few Google engineers that I am good friends with and they  basically laughed it off. I was on the Organic SEO panel with Aaron (he&#8217;s on Matt  Cutts&#8217; team) and there are no big filters being worked on currently.</p>
<p>So what  is being worked on?</p>
<p>1) They  just launched some new features with Website Optimizer which now allows you  to remove criteria without having to create a new campaign.<br />
2) Webmaster Tools will be adding a function in the next 30 days to  allow you to view the domains which are linking to you and their &#8220;order&#8221; of importance. Note: I would be VERY surprised if they really did order  them by importance as Google is very protective of their data and ranking  algorithm.<br />
3) &#8220;Universal Search&#8221; will continue to be a priority.<br />
4) Ridding the index of Search Spam is one of the top priorities and  will continue to be.</p>
<p>Q: Why  does a page bounce from #5 to #20 and back to #5? Is this an algorithm  alteration?</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> This can either be different datacenters being hit based on traffic  levels or your ISP (if it is a national ISP) connecting to different datacenters.  It could also be caused by either the domain or the page not having enough authority and getting small &#8220;bursts&#8221; of links but they aren&#8217;t enough to sustain it at #5, therefore it slides back to #20. Due to the  complexities of the algorithm, it is too difficult for us (Google) to make a  determination of ranking changes for just one keyword phrase.</p>
<p>Q: How  should video be SEO&#8217;d? If they were going to put video on their own personal  site, what would they do to ensure it ranks well for the targeted keyword  phrases?</p>
<p><strong>A: </strong>Google is adding by this weekend (according to talk at SES) about 70+ pieces to  their algorithm. Most of the additions are in the video / Web 2.0 space. I talked to A  LOT of engineers about this and you know that glazed look in people&#8217;s eye when  they have NO CLUE how to answer a question, but they keep talking? This is  what happened when I asked this one. They knew all about video, but wouldn&#8217;t  give any specifics. I am testing this right now, so when I have some solid  data, I&#8217;ll let you know.</p>
<p>In the  meantime, if you use YouTube (owned by Google) to post your video and then embed  them in your site it gives you some of the best tags for video right now.</p>
<p>Q: What  gives with Froogle showing up in the #3 spot?</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> The engineer I spoke with was obviously new, as the name &#8220;Froogle&#8221; threw her off &#8230; as it no longer goes by that name. Instead, it is  known as &#8220;Google Products&#8221; and including these results in the SERPs is based on the Universal Search process which has been implemented inside of  Google for some time now.</p>
<p>You can  read more about <a href="http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/universal-search-uncovered/">Universal Search</a> from my test results.</p>
<p>&lt; http://www.webmarketingnow.net/site.php/arti/read/universal-search-uncovered/ &gt;</p>
<p>Their  plan is to continue to test and to see how the SERPs are reacted by the users. That  is one thing Google does very well. Instead of trying to guess what people  want, they present it, test the reaction and then they make changes accordingly.  There have been many changes Google has implemented over the years, that were  quietly removed because they were negatives in the user experience.</p>
<p>Know  this: Google is NOT going to sit still, they will continue to change things,  test and see what makes for a better experience for the end user.</p>
<p><strong>Q:  Why does Google show a different number of indexed pages? For example, doing  the &#8220;site&#8221; command returns 1,600 pages, however, scrolling to the end the number is 350.</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> This is a mix of both pages in the Supplemental Index and duplicate  content pages. Mostly, the issue is duplicate content. While Google has removed  the ability to actually see &#8220;only&#8221; pages in the Supplemental index, it does still exist.</p>
<p>It is recommended that if you have a high range as given in this example that  you analyze the information in your Google Webmaster Tools account. Chances  are good there are issues with duplicate Titles and/or Descriptions which  are the main reasons for duplicate content.</p>
<p>Know  that when you see discrepancies like this the issue is with your site and not a  reporting problem by Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/16/blackhat-ses-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackhat &#8211; Link Building</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-link-building/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-link-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloaking Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Hartzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversational mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decent piece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Enge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Copland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piece of advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Malicoat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Community   Hacking &#8211; 96 Baiting Strategies You Can Employ
This was a near  repeat of the session from last year. This is a classic example of  marketing hype. They didn&#8217;t go over 96 Link Baiting strategies. How did  they come up with 96? Well, there are  12 types of links [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fblackhat-link-building%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fblackhat-link-building%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Community   Hacking &#8211; 96 Baiting Strategies You Can Employ</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">This was a near  repeat of the session from last year. This is a classic example of  marketing hype. They didn&#8217;t go over 96 Link Baiting strategies. How did  they come up with 96? Well, there are  12 types of links and eight types  of link bait. 12 x 8 = 96. Yeah, I know, I thought it was lame too.  Basically they covered only 8 strategies, and sadly, not all 8 were not  worthy of covering.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;Link Bait&#8221; isn&#8217;t  without controversy. If you aren&#8217;t familiar with the term,<br />
</span></p>
<p>1.<strong> </strong>Bill Hartzer, Search Engine  Optimization Manager,  Vizion Interactive</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<li>Regularly  create Link Bait on your site and  encourage everyone to participate. <em> </em><em>JW: This is called a Blog. I would reserve for Link Bait in a  &#8220;conversational&#8221; mode to be placed in your Blog.</em></li>
<li>Respond to breaking news immediately, post  quickly  and submit to social sites. This  will help you boost your organic  rankings, as more pages are created and you have a better shot at  getting links if you get in the conversation early.</li>
<li>JW: And in &#8220;classic fashion&#8221; of using the same  presentation as last year and not verifying the links, Hartzer  recommends using  <a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/">Blogstorm  Tracker</a>, which offered the service last year to track a Blog&#8217;s most  important posts based on incoming links. The problem is, they don&#8217;t  offer the service anymore. I am checking into the possibility of adding a  tool like it to our tool set.</li>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">2. Jane Copland,  Search Marketing  Consultant, SEOMoz</span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>It is always a  good idea to enable comments as readers  comments add value to your  site and make your site more interesting. You should only disable  comments when  comments are inappropriate. <em> </em><em>JW: And this was the only decent piece of advice given. I highly  advise using the Spam Karma plugin for WordPress. It has greatly reduced  the amount of Spam comments to my Blogs.</em></li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">3. Todd Malicoat,  Independent  Marketing Consultant, Meta4creations, LLC</span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>Focused a lot  on Digg and how you need a strong network of &#8220;friends&#8221; or &#8220;buddies&#8221; to  &#8220;Digg&#8221; your stories.<em>JW: Things are more complex than that now. That may have been easy  to do a year ago, but not today. I will have more information in the  Social Media write-up.</em></li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">4. Ian Ring,  Application Developer,  IGLOO Inc.</span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>Measure all  page elements: clicks, purchases,  subscriptions, sales leads,  registration and duplicate those that thrive.</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;">Real-World   Low-Risk, High-Reward Link Building Strategies</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"> 1. Eric Enge,  President, Stone Temple  Consulting</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial; font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<li>Social News  sites give opportunities for links  if you keep the audience interested  and create valuable content.<em>JW: &#8220;Valuable Content&#8221; is oversold at these conferences. It is  MARKETABLE content. There is a difference.</em></li>
<li>Always build content that will build your   reputation. Be authoritative and make  sure you exude the right image.<em> </em><em>JW: Examples of this would includes: always check your resources for  accuracy, make sure you look at the &#8220;other side&#8221; of the story, admit  when you are wrong, downplay when you are right, give credit to others  when possible, etc.</em></li>
<li>Pay special attention to your title. Your title  must be compelling and  interesting. Your keyword needs to be in the  title and in the Digg submission  title.</li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-link-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackhat &#8211; Market Share Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-market-share-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-market-share-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ytd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
This information is killer for your business and well worth the  read. Digest the important info in about twelve minutes, as I not only  give you the numbers, but more importantly, what to do with the  information. 
Often when we create sites or focus on a market, we tend to  forget [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fblackhat-market-share-numbers%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fblackhat-market-share-numbers%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">This information is killer for your business and well worth the  read. Digest the important info in about twelve minutes, as I not only  give you the numbers, but more importantly, what to do with the  information. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Often when we create sites or focus on a market, we tend to  forget to check the trends and how they have evolved. I have taken the  numbers so far this year and compared the numbers of 2005 and 2006. The  hope here is to see &#8220;trends&#8221; and the path visitors are headed with  technology so you can stay ahead instead of being in constant &#8220;chase&#8221;  mode. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Many people ask me what I feel is one of the things which gives  me an edge in the affiliate space. This is one of them. Now, the one  thing about web stats is it&#8217;s great information, but it can also suck  your time dry.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">The data below is taken from <strong><strong>REAL</strong></strong> affiliate  sites. Real sites with real visitors. These are US based sites only and  do not include any foreign properties. The YTD numbers include the  change from the August numbers so you can see the trend from the last  three months. To make this data real easy to digest, I marked any key  data, which increased in <strong>BLUE</strong> and decreased in <strong>RED</strong>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">On to the information&#8230; (Note: If you have a text reader for  email &#8211; you will need to login to the back office in order to view the  numbers correctly).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Visitor  Return Frequency</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="383">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="88" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>1 Day</strong></td>
<td width="51" bgcolor="#cccccc">31%</td>
<td width="50" bgcolor="#cccccc">29%</td>
<td width="52" bgcolor="#cccccc">34%</td>
<td width="120" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>38%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2 Days</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3 Days</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">8%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4 Days</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">5 Days</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6-10 Days</td>
<td>12%</td>
<td>13%</td>
<td>14%</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11-20 Days</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>21-30 Days</strong></td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>6%</td>
<td><strong>6%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31+ Days</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">9%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">9%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> This refers to the frequency of visits by a user. You want your sites  to be &#8220;sticky.&#8221; The idea of making a site &#8220;sticky&#8221; has been preached in  the Internet community for about a decade now. I know, it is a &#8220;yawner&#8221;  but it is still an issue you MUST consider.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">As you can see from the data, visitors coming back everyday is  strong, and in showing a strong upward trend over the last two years. My  testing shows that Blogging and &#8220;email drip&#8221; systems are pushing these  numbers up. Think about it; if one-third want to come back everyday how  would that change your content development schedule? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">As stated above, this is where a blog can come in handy. Also,  keeping in contact with your visitors via email is a good move &#8230; and I  have seen no fall out by contacting my lists on my affiliate sites  every five days with new information, even if it is to tell them about a  new blog post. Just keep the emails short, to the point and make sure  there is great content for them to read. Nothing is more disappointing  than being taken by an &#8220;evening news hook&#8221; trick &#8230; you &#8220;stay tuned&#8221;  through the commercial only to be served lame content. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">If you contact your list via email, don&#8217;t give them the  information in the email. Instead, give them a link to your site or  blog. Get them back to your site whenever possible. Your goal is to get  them back to your site over and over again until they buy or buy again.  What is really interesting is the consistency of the numbers in the 2,  3, 4 and 5 day returns. What is also good to realize, the numbers are  still strong 6-30 days out. This means if you remain in contact with  your list, even if it is on a monthly basis, you are likely to get them  back to your site. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Fact:</strong></strong> I can tell you from my testing if you stack your return visits within a  few days of the original visit, your conversions ratios will surge. I  have interviewed dozens of buyers who said, &#8220;You kept in contact with me  and it seemed that the questions/concerns I had with the product were  answered in your follow-up emails. It was highly professional and  engaging.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>What You Should Do:</strong></strong> Do you have new content to show new visitors on a daily basis? A weekly  basis? If your answer is &#8220;no&#8221; then you need to get a plan in place to  get new content on your site that will assist in converting those  visitors into buyers. Look at your own numbers and see how they compare  with the numbers above. If they are a lot lower in return visits within  the first five days, you need to revamp your approach so you can get  them to come back more often. </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: x-small;">1) Make sure you have a Blog (Get &#8220;Fantastico&#8221; for your web  server, which allows basically a one-button install for WordPress).<br />
2) Email your list at least once a month (I use </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a title="http://www.1automationwiz.com/app/?pr=29&amp;id=65522" href="http://www.1automationwiz.com/app/?pr=29&amp;id=65522">1AutomationWiz</a> and swear by it).<br />
3) Add new, engaging content at least once a week (Hire a Ghostwriter  through <a title="http://www.elance.com/" href="http://www.elance.com/">eLance</a>, <a title="http://www.guru.com/" href="http://www.guru.com/">Guru.com</a>, <a title="http://www.webmarketingnow.com/odesk/" href="http://www.webmarketingnow.com/odesk/">oDesk.com</a> or <a title="http://www.rentacoder.com/" href="http://www.rentacoder.com/">RentaCoder</a>).</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Organic  Search Engine Market Share</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="428">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08 </strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="106" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>Google.com</strong></td>
<td width="64" bgcolor="#cccccc">50.5%</td>
<td width="56" bgcolor="#cccccc">54.1%</td>
<td width="57" bgcolor="#cccccc">51.2%</td>
<td width="123" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>58.7%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Yahoo.com</strong></td>
<td>12.1%</td>
<td>7.2%</td>
<td>10.2%</td>
<td><strong>6.0%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>MSN.com</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10.0%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>3.7%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Google.co.uk</td>
<td>8.5%</td>
<td>7.1%</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
<td>9.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Google.ca</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">5.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Google.com.au</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Google.co.in</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Google.nl</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Google.br</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">na</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">na</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white">Google.de</td>
<td bgcolor="white">1.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.9%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Google.es</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">na</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">na</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white">Google.pl</td>
<td bgcolor="white">na</td>
<td bgcolor="white">na</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Google.fr</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white">aol.com</td>
<td bgcolor="white">1.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.9%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">0.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">co.uk &#8211; Google United Kingdom</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
<span id="more-907"></span> .ca &#8211; Google Canada<br />
.au &#8211; Google Australia<br />
.in &#8211; Google India<br />
.nl &#8211; Google Netherlands<br />
.de &#8211; Google Germany<br />
.fr &#8211; Google France<br />
.es &#8211; Google Spain<br />
.pl &#8211; Google Poland<br />
.br &#8211; Google Brazil </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Notables</strong></strong><br />
dogpile.com &#8211; 0.23%<br />
alexa.com &#8211; 0.14%<br />
altavista.com &#8211; 0.16%<br />
alltheweb.com &#8211; 0.04%<br />
hotbot.com &#8211; 0.02%<br />
lycos.com &#8211; 0.01%<br />
mamma.com &#8211; 0.01%</p>
<p><strong><strong>Note:</strong></strong> These figures are based on <strong><strong>ORGANIC</strong></strong> traffic, not from paid  search. This is why these figures will be different than any other  &#8220;market share&#8221; report you see. Knowing market share for PPC is a waste  because you can easily figure that out when you set up your account.  What you want to know is the click-through rate of organic search. So  what if a search engine has a 20% market share if their organic listings  are pushed so far down the page no one ever sees them? That is why  these numbers are vital for every Webmaster and SEO consultant to have. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">What about Ask.com? Ask is not listed on purpose as I &#8220;block&#8221;  their bot from all of our sites. According to testing, very little  traffic comes from their organic search, and their bot sucks the  lifeblood from my servers. To me, Ask is nothing more than a glorified  site scraper. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>All Google Properties YTD: 80.4% </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> Google continues to literally crush the competition and I have some  niches where over 90% of my organic traffic comes from Google. And look  how Yahoo! and MSN are falling. This can be directly related to how much  Yahoo! and Microsoft are focused on PPC ad revenue as they strive to  push the paid ads and concentrate less on organic rankings.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Now back to the data. As I said earlier, you won&#8217;t see these  types of numbers anywhere else. The numbers I am reporting aren&#8217;t  &#8220;searches&#8221; they are organic click throughs. To me, these are real  numbers and ones you can base your marketing campaigns on. From other  reports you will see confusing percentages, ones that add up to over  100%, as they take into consideration &#8220;all searches&#8221; on the Internet.  Seriously, you don&#8217;t care about &#8220;searches&#8221; &#8211; you care about &#8220;clicks&#8221;,  right? Let&#8217;s look at the &#8220;market share&#8221; as reported by </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a title="http://www.comscore.com/press/data.asp" href="http://www.comscore.com/press/data.asp">comScore</a>. </span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="429">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>Jul. &#8216;06 </strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>Dec. &#8216;06 </strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>Sept. &#8216;07 </strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>July &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="159" bgcolor="#cccccc">Google Sites</td>
<td width="62" bgcolor="#cccccc">46.2%</td>
<td width="62" bgcolor="#cccccc">47.3%</td>
<td width="62" bgcolor="#cccccc">57.0%</td>
<td width="62" bgcolor="#cccccc">61.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yahoo! Sites</td>
<td>29.8%</td>
<td>28.5%</td>
<td>23.7%</td>
<td>20.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Microsoft Sites</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">12.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">8.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white">Ask Network</td>
<td bgcolor="white">5.0%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">5.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">4.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="white">4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">AOL LLC</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">6.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.9%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.3%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Here is where I have difficulty with the numbers. We look at  these market shares and then focus our efforts in organic search in  regards to the engines that have the most market share, right? Right.  Above is comScore&#8217;s data, and Google has nearly two-thirds of the  market, followed by Yahoo! with just over 20% and Microsoft trailing  with about 10%. Ask and AOL are on the map with about 5% share each. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Is that really true? Is that really accurate? Should you base  your marketing plan on that information? I hope you don&#8217;t.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Let&#8217;s look at the real numbers that <em><em>actually produce organic click through  traffic</em></em>. We all know we can open a PPC account today  and have traffic in a few hours to a few days depending on whom we use.  That is a no brainer. But the organic traffic, the unlimited source of  clicks based on our own abilities and not the size of our budget is what  we are mostly interested in. That is undeniable fact.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Google US has control of over half the market and when you look  at the total Google share, with all their foreign indexes, <strong><strong>they control over 80% of the organic  market</strong></strong>. Look at your referral traffic and you  should see similar numbers.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Why are the numbers so different with Yahoo!? One of the main  reasons is Yahoo! continues to stack PPC ads at the top of the search  results, which means more clicks occur on their PPC listings than their  organic listings. And Microsoft? Let&#8217;s face it, they have a great  looking search portal, it is just unfortunate that no one uses it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Let&#8217;s move onto Ask and AOL. While comScore states each has a  market share of 5%, check your log files. Seriously, check your log  files. Do you have 5% of your referral traffic from either of these  properties? If you do, please send me a screen shot because none of my  properties have anything close to a 5% share. AOL barely registers, and  the traffic from Ask has been so pathetic and their bot so &#8220;indexing  happy&#8221; I finally had enough and blocked Ask completely. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Forums, conferences and ads on television promote Ask often.  Well, fine. Publicity and commercials just don&#8217;t matter &#8211; it is clicks.  Clicks drive your business. Why optimize for an engine that doesn&#8217;t  produce clicks? You shouldn&#8217;t. Don&#8217;t waste your time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>What You Should Do:</strong></strong> Continue to focus solely on Google and hope the optimization work you  do gains favorable rankings in Yahoo! and MSN. At this time, it isn&#8217;t  worth it to optimize for any other engine but Google. There just isn&#8217;t  enough share to get a positive ROI. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Notable:</strong></strong> How effective is the Yahoo Directory for clicks? &#8211; Average of 78 clicks  per site in 2005, 54 in 2006, 59 in 2007 and so far this year the  average is just 22. That&#8217;s less than five clicks per month. Ouch. Figure  the CPC and you may have heart failure. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Browsers</strong></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">A total of 8 unique browsers were detected. </span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="427">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="123" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>Internet Explorer</strong></td>
<td width="58" bgcolor="#cccccc">73.1%</td>
<td width="60" bgcolor="#cccccc">64.7%</td>
<td width="64" bgcolor="#cccccc">61.6%</td>
<td width="100" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>51.5%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>FireFox</strong></td>
<td>20.3%</td>
<td>29.5%</td>
<td>32.6%</td>
<td><strong>39.4%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Safari</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.8%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.9%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mozilla</td>
<td>na</td>
<td>na</td>
<td>na</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Opera</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1/2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> This is the first report in some time which FireFox has lost market  share. While it is just a slight decrease, IE picked up a healthy 1.5%.  It is recommended you begin to test your sites in FireFox to ensure they  look proper. We have a strong belief (and apologies to Mac Safari  users) that unless a browser has over a 25% market share, it is not cost  effective to be compliant. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Browser  Versions</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="425">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="84" bgcolor="#cccccc">IE 7.0</td>
<td width="60" bgcolor="#cccccc">n/a</td>
<td width="57" bgcolor="#cccccc">4.8%</td>
<td width="87" bgcolor="#cccccc">28.1%</td>
<td width="115" bgcolor="#cccccc">32.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FireFox 2.0</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>27.4%</td>
<td>32.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">IE 6.0</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">70.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Firefox 3.0</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> A total of 118 different browsers were detected. IE 7 and FireFox 2 are  now neck and neck and basically dead even. Those are the two browsers  you should verify your site looks perfect in. FireFox 3.0 has had too  many negative issues for it to be a player until at least the beginning  of next year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Cookies</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="432">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="96" bgcolor="#cccccc">Enabled</td>
<td width="80" bgcolor="#cccccc">87.0%</td>
<td width="66" bgcolor="#cccccc">89.9%</td>
<td width="75" bgcolor="#cccccc">88.7%</td>
<td width="93" bgcolor="#cccccc">90.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Disabled</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
<td>10.1%</td>
<td>11.3%</td>
<td>9.6%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> We&#8217;ve been waiting for years for this figure to move past 90% and it  finally has. While this number isn&#8217;t entirely accurate as it probably is  factoring in requests by a search engine spider or bot scrapers, which  don&#8217;t accept cookies. If you run an eCommerce shopping cart that is  cookie dependant or if you are an affiliate and your commissions are  tracked by cookies, this is excellent news.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>What this means:</strong></strong> There are a very small percentage of users who do not allow cookies at  all. Many use FireFox extensions that alert JavaScript calls. JavaScript  is how a cookie is set on a visitor&#8217;s computer and cookies are the way  affiliate links are most often tracked. Now, if the shopping cart being  used requires cookies to process the order, the user may turn them on  for check out, but surveys show the users are more likely to either call  a toll-free order number or cancel the purchase. If you or your  merchant has a toll-free order line available, make sure there is a  method in place to track your leads coming in.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>JavaScript  Version </strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="419">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="40" bgcolor="#cccccc">1.3</td>
<td width="65" bgcolor="#cccccc">66.7%</td>
<td width="67" bgcolor="#cccccc">62.7%</td>
<td width="74" bgcolor="#cccccc">57.9</td>
<td width="151" bgcolor="#cccccc">48.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>24.3%</td>
<td>33.1%</td>
<td>45.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.0</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.5</td>
<td>24.1%</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> Why does this matter? If you are using a 2.0 version script, only about  2% of visitors may be able to view it properly. It is advisable to keep  your JavaScript to level 1.6 or below. I used to recommend keeping it  at 1.3 or below, but with the added market share of 1.6, you can now  step up. Yes, you may sacrifice some functionality, but deliverability  is always more important.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">For your information, we use JavaScript 1.2 for most of our  functions and we are operating just fine. If you don&#8217;t know, ask your  web designer/developer.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Operating  System</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="414">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong>2005</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong>2006</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="89" bgcolor="#cccccc">Windows</td>
<td width="65" bgcolor="#cccccc">93.7%</td>
<td width="60" bgcolor="#cccccc">92.9%</td>
<td width="82" bgcolor="#cccccc">91.1%</td>
<td width="96" bgcolor="#cccccc">86.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macintosh</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
<td>8.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Linux</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary: </strong></strong>Wow.  Check out the growth from the Mac. Nearly doubling their market share  since 2005. Windows continues a downward trend, and it has experienced  is sharpest decline this year due to the problems with Vista. Consumers  are moving away from Microsoft and are looking for more stable  environments to work in. Depending on your industry, you might want to  take notice at the changes Apple has done, especially with their Apple  Stores. They are the most profitable stores in America (per square foot  of retail space) and they understand usability, customer service and  delivering a solid product.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>OS Version</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="426">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="129" bgcolor="#cccccc">Windows XP/Vista</td>
<td width="60" bgcolor="#cccccc">81.3%</td>
<td width="58" bgcolor="#cccccc">82.3%</td>
<td width="65" bgcolor="#cccccc">78.8%</td>
<td width="92" bgcolor="#cccccc">68.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Windows NT 6.0</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>14.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Macintosh OS X</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">5.9%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">8.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Linux</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Windows 98</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.0%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.8%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary: </strong></strong>Even  though Windows XP/Vista is moving down in market share, NT is growing.  And it looks like Windows 98 is about dead and Windows 2000 isn&#8217;t far  behind with just 3% of the market and dropping fast.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Screen  Resolution</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="386">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" bgcolor="#cccccc">1024 x 768</td>
<td width="61" bgcolor="#cccccc">50.6%</td>
<td width="56" bgcolor="#cccccc">46.5%</td>
<td width="70" bgcolor="#cccccc">41.2%</td>
<td width="83" bgcolor="#cccccc">31.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1280 x 1024</td>
<td>17.5%</td>
<td>20.8%</td>
<td>19.2%</td>
<td>18.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1280 x 800</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.0%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">5.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">9.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1680 x 1050</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>8.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1440 x 900</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.4%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.8%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">7.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>800 x 600</td>
<td>12.9%</td>
<td>8.0%</td>
<td>7.1%</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1152 x 864</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">4.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.5%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> The best news continues to be the drop of 800 x 600 &#8230; the WORST  resolution for web designers. Despite a sharp drop since 2005, 1024 x  768 continues to be the dominant resolution.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Countries</strong></strong></span></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="423">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="white"></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2005</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2006</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>2007</strong></strong></td>
<td bgcolor="white"><strong><strong>YTD &#8216;08</strong></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="96" bgcolor="#cccccc">United States</td>
<td width="67" bgcolor="#cccccc">55.1%</td>
<td width="67" bgcolor="#cccccc">56.8%</td>
<td width="66" bgcolor="#cccccc">60.2%</td>
<td width="105" bgcolor="#cccccc">53.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Great Britain</td>
<td>9.4%</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>7.5%</td>
<td>9.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Canada</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">6.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">6.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">6.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>India</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Australia</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">3.2%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Netherlands</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Germany</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.7%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.0%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spain</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Italy</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">1.1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.8%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.6%</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>France</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>Commentary:</strong></strong> The sites that were built and used in this study were all sites built  for a US audience. Of course, the sites are available worldwide. So,  based on these numbers, would it make sense to offer the site in another  language? These numbers do not indicate it would produce a positive  ROI. The strongest non-English country has less than 2% of the referral  traffic. However, if you notice the US-based visitors account for just  over half the overall traffic, it does raise concern, as most of the  products offered make international shipping impractical due to the  expense.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">This means only about half of the visitors to the sites can  realistically order product. That isn&#8217;t good. Because the visitors are  all organic, I&#8217;m not losing money bringing them in, however, I do have  an audience that cannot purchase. Therefore, I must brainstorm to figure  out ways to monetize half of my traffic.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><strong>What You Should Do:</strong></strong> Here is a checklist of what you should be doing with your sites based  on these numbers:</span></p>
<ul type="disc"><span style="font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>Update your content at  least once per week, but preferably every other day.</li>
<li>Look into getting a Blog started on your site;  you can post it as a sub directory (http://www.domain.com/blog/) or sub  domain (http://blog.domain.com/).</li>
<li>Contact your mailing list every 5-15 days, but  at least once a month. Get them to come back to your site instead of  giving them the information right in the email.</li>
<li>With your organic traffic, focus on Google  heavily.</li>
<li>Ensure your sites display properly in IE 7 along  with FireFox 2.0.</li>
<li>If you are an affiliate verify your merchant  has telephone ordering options to track and credit you with sales.</li>
<li>Check the version of JavaScript you are using for  your site and verify it is version 1.6 or lower as about 2/3rds of the  market may not be able to display higher versions of JavaScript  consistently.</li>
<li>Test your offers. Are they easy to understand?  Verify your Calls to Action can be seen &#8220;above the fold&#8221; in resolutions  1024&#215;768 and 1280&#215;1024.</li>
<li>Even if you are targeting US citizens for your  marketing, just over half your visitors will be from the US. Verify you  have other options for them.</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">Set aside a block of 2-3  hours this week to tackle the above and you might be surprised to  discover some very simple flaws in your site(s) that are resulting in  lower conversions. Correct those and your revenues will be up without  any increase in traffic.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/03/15/blackhat-market-share-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIP Service Finally Added &amp; Cookie Stuffer Complete</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/15/vip-service-finally-added/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/15/vip-service-finally-added/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Click Per Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloaking Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alot of people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat vip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bottom banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie stuffing blackhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie stuffing script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[followers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[login details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vip forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vip service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Finally I have got my finger out of my arse, and installed the cookie stuffing script
I have had alot of people asking about Forums and VIP service So once again here we go. I have alot to add and to update.
The VIP service will get access to tools not seen in the SEO Community, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F15%2Fvip-service-finally-added%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F15%2Fvip-service-finally-added%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Finally I have got my finger out of my arse, and installed the cookie stuffing script</p>
<p>I have had alot of people asking about Forums and VIP service So once again here we go. I have alot to add and to update.</p>
<p>The VIP service will get access to tools not seen in the SEO Community, and alot of quality Info ect..</p>
<p>People wanting to Buy VIP status can go here: <a href="http://secure.plimus.com/jsp/dev_store1.jsp?developerId=713128"><span style="color: #ff0000;">BUY VIP</span></a> or Just click the bottom banner on the blog. Payments can be made through paypal, wire, cheque and Credit Cards via Plimus.</p>
<p>Previous Followers &amp; Members Contact me for Discounts</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Also </span>the Cookie Stuffing Script is <span style="color: #ff0000;">Complete</span>, which can enable forum stuffing , Image stuffing, SWF Stuffing &amp; Fake the referrer , plus live statistics all with front end and backend login. Possible the best Cookie Stuffing script made to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/15/vip-service-finally-added/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New CPA Facebook Application nearly Developed</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/13/new-cpa-facebook-application-nearly-developed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/13/new-cpa-facebook-application-nearly-developed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook blackhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafia wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
I have currently been building a new Facebook script that works like super rewards. It has been merged with another script I was currently using however I will be targetting users of such games as Farmville and mafia wars , to then undertake the Aquired CPA offer to gain special game bonuses. Of course all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F13%2Fnew-cpa-facebook-application-nearly-developed%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F13%2Fnew-cpa-facebook-application-nearly-developed%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I have currently been building a new Facebook script that works like super rewards. It has been merged with another script I was currently using however I will be targetting users of such games as Farmville and mafia wars , to then undertake the Aquired CPA offer to gain special game bonuses. Of course all they will get is sweet FA , apart from making me money.</p>
<p>It works but still has a few bugs.. and should be launched within the next week for testing..</p>
<p>I will keep people updated on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/13/new-cpa-facebook-application-nearly-developed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackhat Cheat Sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/blackhat-cheat-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/blackhat-cheat-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat cheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat cheat sheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Quick Reference Cheat Sheet




Google
Yahoo
Live


Avg. time: submission, index, cache
1-5 weeks
2-3 weeks
2-4 weeks


Deep Crawls Websites Every 
30-45 days
4-6 weeks
5-7 weeks


Title Characters Displayed SERPs
66*
71
70


Title Indexed
Yes
Yes
Yes


Level of Importance of Title Tag
Average
High
Very High


Description Characters Displayed SERPs
156
169
200


Description Tag Indexed
Yes
Yes
Yes


Description Tag Used as Description
Varies
Yes**
Yes


Level of Importance of Description Tag
Average
High
Average


Meta Keywords Indexed
No
Yes
Yes


Meta Keywords Characters Indexed
n/a
500+
500+


Level of Importance of Keyword Tag
n/a
High
Average+


Support Frames
Partial
Partial
Partial


Indexes NoFrames Content
Yes
Yes
Yes


Indexes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fblackhat-cheat-sheet%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fblackhat-cheat-sheet%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Quick Reference Cheat Sheet</p>
<table style="height: 1411px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="455">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="254" align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#83c908"></td>
<td width="100" align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#83c908"><span style="color: #ffffff;"><strong>Google</strong></span></td>
<td width="95" align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#83c908"><span style="color: #ffffff;"><strong>Yahoo</strong></span></td>
<td width="84" align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#83c908"><span style="color: #ffffff;"><strong>Live</strong></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Avg. time: submission, index, cache</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1-5 weeks</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2-3 weeks</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2-4 weeks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Deep Crawls Websites Every </strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">30-45 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">4-6 weeks</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">5-7 weeks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Title Characters Displayed SERPs</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66*</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Title Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Level of Importance of Title Tag</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Average</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Very High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Description Characters Displayed SERPs</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">156</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">169</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Description Tag Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Description Tag Used as Description</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Varies</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes**</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Level of Importance of Description Tag</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Average</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Average</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Meta Keywords Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Meta Keywords Characters Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">n/a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">500+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">500+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Level of Importance of Keyword Tag</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">n/a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Average+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Support Frames</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partial</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partial</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Indexes NoFrames Content</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Indexes all Visible Content</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No limit</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No limit</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No limit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Meta Redirect</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Spam</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Spam</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Spam</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Supports Robots.txt file</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Fully</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partially</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partially</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Indexes Heading Tags</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>LSI Support</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Partially</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Word Count Minimums </strong>(Recommended)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Keyword Density</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2-6%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4-9%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6-9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Word Stemming </strong>(position = positioning)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Word Capitalization </strong>(search = Search)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Search Case Sensitive</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Plural vs. Singular Difference</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Exact Keyword Order </strong>(buy car = buy car)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Comment Tag Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Link Popularity</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Very High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Link Reputation</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Very High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Average</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Average</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Anchor Text Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>ALT Text Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>ALT Text Importance</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Average</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Good</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Hidden Text Penalty</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Hidden Text in Form Indexed</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Form Option Text</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Dynamic Page Support</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Accept cookies or Session IDs</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>CSS Indexed </strong>(On Page / External)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes/Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes/No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes/No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>JavaScript </strong>(On Page / External)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes/Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes/No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes/No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Keyword in Domain  Importance</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Average</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Older Pages Increase in Rank</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Reviewed Sites Preferred</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yahoo<br />
Directory,<br />
ODP, Best of<br />
the Web,</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yahoo<br />
Directory</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Authoritative Site Preference</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Indexes Multiple Levels</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Partial</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Partial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Click Tracking Influence</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">In Place</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">In Place</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Indexing Limits </strong>(Number of Pages)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Supports nofollow</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>Follows Image Maps</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Index Flash pages</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Use PPC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Use PPC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Use PPC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8"><strong>XML Site Map Support</strong></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" bgcolor="#e9fcc8">No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Google will cut off the display in the Title not on a specific character count, but on a<br />
word break.</p>
<p>** If the site is listed in the Yahoo! Directory, the description in the directory takes<br />
priority.</p>
<p>*** MSN will use the first 100 characters of the description and then it will shift to the<br />
first text in the body of the document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/blackhat-cheat-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Switch to PHP &#8211; Keep All Your Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/switch-to-php-keep-all-your-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/switch-to-php-keep-all-your-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php switch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
If you have, or are planning to, changing to PHP (or any other file extension), this article will be well worth your time. I made the switch on quite a few of my domains, including my main domain. The reasons for making the switch are pretty simple:
- more flexibility
- using &#8220;includes&#8221; reduces your file sizes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fswitch-to-php-keep-all-your-rankings%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fswitch-to-php-keep-all-your-rankings%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>If you have, or are planning to, changing to PHP (or any other file extension), this article will be well worth your time. I made the switch on quite a few of my domains, including my main domain. The reasons for making the switch are pretty simple:</p>
<p>- more flexibility<br />
- using &#8220;includes&#8221; reduces your file sizes by 40%<br />
- make a change in just one file instead of every file on your site</p>
<p>However, the biggest drawback is keeping your search engine ranking. Face it, doing a ton of 301 redirects isn&#8217;t fun for anyone.</p>
<p>In order for me to show you how this can be done, and done well, as I said earlier, I did the switch on my main site: Web Marketing Now. The new design is live and it is completely PHP driven.</p>
<p>&#8220;You Liar!&#8221; you say, &#8220;All the files are HTML!&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, you only think they are. They are all PHP and I will show you the trick I used, but first, let&#8217;s review the sites that have STUPID webmasters and whom you can contact to give them the &#8220;fix&#8221; and make a quick $5k as a consultant.</p>
<p>Yahoo! owned Blo.gs</p>
<p><a title="http://blo.gs/ping.html" href="http://blo.gs/ping.html">http://blo.gs/ping.html</a> is a 404 error page. They switched to PHP but didn&#8217;t even bother to do a 301 redirect. Whoops.</p>
<p>Just change the file extension to php and you get the right page: <a title="http://blo.gs/ping.php" href="http://blo.gs/ping.php">http://blo.gs/ping.php</a></p>
<p><strong>WebConfs</strong></p>
<p><a title="http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.html" href="http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.html">http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.html</a> is a 404 error page. Aren&#8217;t they supposed to know about this stuff?</p>
<p>They also switched to PHP: <a title="http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.php" href="http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.php">http://webconfs.com/anchor-text-analysis.php</a> but didn&#8217;t bother to do a redirect.</p>
<p><span id="more-722"></span></p>
<p><strong>Andy Hagans Messed Up?!?!</strong></p>
<p>Yep. Check it out: <a title="http://www.andyhagans.com/link-building.html" href="http://www.andyhagans.com/link-building.html">http://www.andyhagans.com/link-building.html</a> is a page I linked to years ago now shows as a 404 error, but the php version redirects to: <a title="http://www.andyhagans.com/link-baiting.php" href="http://www.andyhagans.com/link-baiting.php">http://www.andyhagans.com/link-baiting.php</a>.</p>
<p>The examples are endless. What blows me away is their webmasters aren&#8217;t even looking at their 404 error report in their logs. Big mistake.</p>
<p>So, what should be done? Well, the fix is easy, and I&#8217;m going to walk you through it. You&#8217;ll love it.</p>
<p>1) Following the switch to PHP file extensions you will have two copies of each page, one in PHP and one in HTML. You will need to delete all HTML versions of your files, as they are duplicate.</p>
<p>2) So you don&#8217;t lose any &#8220;clicks&#8221; from your search engine rankings and incoming links, you want to do a &#8220;mod_rewrite&#8221; in your .htaccess file. This is because all references to your site are with the HTML extension, not PHP. Here is the code to do it:</p>
<p>RewriteEngine on<br />
RewriteRule ^(.*).html $1.php</p>
<p>I know what you are saying, &#8220;That&#8217;s it?!?!? That&#8217;s the code?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>And the best part is that even though your files are in PHP, they will display in the browser as HTML, just as they were before. And Google is none the wiser. Unless&#8230;</p>
<p>3) Your designer did all the internal links as PHP, not as HTML. Oops.</p>
<p><strong>Why This is a Problem:</strong> I did this for testing purposes, and what happens is Google has all of your HTML files indexed, and now it comes to your site and starts eating the PHP files. Even though the mod_rewrite was there, the link it followed was &#8220;php&#8221; and not &#8220;html&#8221; and I noticed my rankings starting to drop.</p>
<p><strong>Solution: </strong>Have your designer do a global search for &#8220;php&#8221; in your site and replace with&#8221;html&#8221;. There is one more step as you will need to do a search for the include statements and change those from HTML back to PHP so the inclusion works properly on your site. After I did this, all of my rankings came back within just a few days.</p>
<p>What do the include statements look like? Here is an example:</p>
<p>&lt;?php include(&#8220;includes/top.php&#8221;); ?&gt;</p>
<div>
<p>This can work with any extension change. For example, if you are moving from .asp to .html. Or from .php to .html. You can keep all of your rankings and your traffic is unaffected. And the best part, you don&#8217;t have to work the entire weekend doing hundreds or thousands of 301 redirects. Just post the code I gave you in your .htaccess file and do the global find and replace and you&#8217;re done.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Update: A few members wrote in and informed me there is an easier way to do this, through the config file. Yes, while that is true, it didn&#8217;t work on a few of my servers, which is why I presented the above method. However, if you want to do it through the config file, just include the following code:</p>
</div>
<div>AddTypeapplication/x-httpd-php .html .htm</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/02/03/switch-to-php-keep-all-your-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Image Stuffing, with Flash and Javascript</title>
		<link>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/01/18/image-stuffing-with-flash-and-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/01/18/image-stuffing-with-flash-and-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloaking Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie stuffing seoblackhat.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faking the referrer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuffing forums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
I will be releasing my new image stuffing script coming soon. You will be able to cookie stuff forums using the /img tag and fake the referrer. This will be in the download section within the next couple of weeks.
So some brief info to add to make this post up..
Step by Step Forum Stuffing
Step 1
Make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F18%2Fimage-stuffing-with-flash-and-javascript%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seoblackhat.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F18%2Fimage-stuffing-with-flash-and-javascript%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I will be releasing my new image stuffing script coming soon. You will be able to cookie stuff forums using the /img tag and fake the referrer. This will be in the download section within the next couple of weeks.</p>
<p>So some brief info to add to make this post up..</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Step by Step Forum Stuffing</span></strong></p>
<p>Step 1</p>
<p>Make a Forum List</p>
<p>Use the Google searches from Lesson2 to make a forum list that is targeted to the affiliate program you want to stuff. You should start off with at least 20 forums to see what works but some people start with 50. I recommend using an Excel file to keep track of your forums and usernames. You can also keep track of the rules for each forum. An example would be that some forums requires 10 posts before you can post an IMG.</p>
<p>Step 2</p>
<p>Prepare your IMG links</p>
<p>Use your cookie stuffing script to generate your IMG links from your affiliate program links. Double check everything and make sure you are using the correct affiliate link and image url. Do a few tests and make sure it shows up in your stats log. If some of your forums allow HTML you can also prepare a flash code to use in those forums if your script allows it.</p>
<p>Step 3</p>
<p>Start posting!</p>
<p>BHW, WarriorForums and WickedFire are not good forums to stuff as they know all about cookie stuffing.</p>
<p>Start posting in the forums and use your IMG link in either the sig or right after the post text. Be careful on the forums and do not over do it. A few posts a day per forum is usually fine. If a forum is big enough and moves fast you may be able to do more posts. You will need to use the [IMG] [/IMG] code to insert the cookie stuffing IMG URL in your post.<br />
If you want to stuff in QUANTITY of cookie stuffs you can reply to a lot of posts on the forum every day (you need a well thought out response) and hope that the forum does not notice. If you want QUALITY cookie stuffing you need to make a thread about what you are stuffing, or you can just reply to other threads about it. I would recommend waiting until you have a reputation on the forum before starting threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoblackhat.co.uk/2010/01/18/image-stuffing-with-flash-and-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
